News & Commentary

The Michigan Supreme Court said today it will hear arguments in an American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan case seeking to strike down the City of Wyoming’s ordinance that bans medical marijuana because it directly violates the state’s Medical Marihuana Act. The lawsuit was originally filed in November 2010 on behalf of John Ter Beek, a retired attorney and medical marijuana patient who suffers from diabetes and a neurological disorder that causes neuropathy and severe pain. In August 2012, the state appeals court declared the ordinance “void and unenforceable.” In 2008, the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act was approved on a statewide ballot. Sixty-three percent of voters approved the law statewide, including 59 percent of voters in Wyoming. The ordinance was adopted by the Wyoming City Council in 2010 despite a public outcry. While it does not specifically mention medical marijuana, it prohibits any violations of federal law. Because medical marijuana is still technically illegal under federal law, the city used this terminology to ban medical marijuana. The following can be attributed to Dan Korobkin, ACLU of Michigan staff attorney: “People across the state overwhelmingly voted to protect patients who use medical marijuana from punishment and penalty. We believe the appeals court properly rejected the misguided efforts of a few local officials to undo the results of that historic election. We are confident that the Supreme Court will uphold the will of the people and uphold the rights of patients and caregivers who have done nothing wrong, but are nonetheless treated like criminals by local officials.”

When Proposal 2 passed in 2006, it banned race-conscious college admissions policies in Michigan. I was only 16 — too young to vote but old enough to know it would affect the quality and accessibility of education in Michigan. After growing up in a district with a notoriously wide opportunity gap, I felt compelled to find a way to fight this destructive decision.I became a plaintiff in a case contesting the constitutionality of Proposal 2, which will be heard by the Supreme Court on October 15, because the lack of diversity on campus affects not just me and my peers, but the quality of education being provided to future generationsWhen I started school at University of Michigan as a transfer student in 2009, the student body was composed mostly of students admitted before the passage of Proposal 2, and its diversity reflected this. Yet over the next few years, I witnessed firsthand as this diversity declined, bringing the level of discourse and academic rigor down with it.As a graduate of the University of Michigan's School of Education, this decline was particularly troubling. As we entered public schools as student-teachers, my peers and I were confronted with a tough realization --our mentor teachers were doing creative, necessary work to build equitable classrooms, yet many of us were not prepared to participate. The School of Education is nationally recognized as one of the best teacher preparation programs in the world. However, the vast majority of its students are white and middle-class. No matter how rigorous the curriculum or varied the content of the teacher education program, it cannot prepare teachers to teach all students equitably if they are not learning in universities that reflect the diversity of the K-12 classrooms they will enter.The education program at University of Michigan is actively seeking to build a more diverse study body, but there have been roadblocks. Because of Prop 2, admissions officers at U of M cannot consider the race of student applicants as even one factor among many in deciding who would best contribute to the university community and the broader goals of diversity.Conversely, prospective students whose parents are alumni are welcome to call up the admissions office and let them know that they should give a second look to a legacy applicant. But if my classmates and I want to tell the university to consider race of one of many factors, the only thing we could do is enact a constitutional amendment. And I don't have $5 million lying around, which is what experts say is the bare minimum it costs to launch such a campaign.Without an ability to attract and train a diverse student body, future teachers will continue to be largely homogenous, entering classrooms without cultural competence.Today I teach in an elementary school in the Brownsville neighborhood of Brooklyn, N.Y. My classroom is named after the University of Michigan and my students are all called "Future Wolverines." They sing "Hail to the Victors" to celebrate learning the parts of speech.I put my college education to use every day as I design curriculum and build community among my kids. However, I wonder if I could have offered my students—the vast majority of whom are African-American--a better, more reflective instruction if Prop 2 had not passed. I wonder if they will have a chance to see themselves among the graduates of U of M.At 16, I believed that Proposal 2 would change higher education in Michigan. Today, I understand those consequences all too well. I hope the Supreme Court recognizes this so that my students have an opportunity I didn't have -- to learn in a diverse university environment that reflects the world we live in.By Molly Nestor

Monday, we celebrated the 11th annual International Right to Know Day, recognizing the right of access to information and the importance of government transparency.

This Wednesday, the House Families, Children and Seniors Committee will consider legislation that would allow adoption agencies the right to discriminate against certain families, denying a home for a child in need.

When a 14-year-old is sentenced to die in prison, everyone involved questions the dignity of a society that would throw away someone so young. As a judge forced to hand down mandatory life sentences to juvenile offenders, I know that better than most. Despite recent rulings by the U.S. Supreme Court and Michigan courts declaring that sentencing children to mandatory life without parole is unconstitutional, 360 people still sit in prison for crimes they committed when they were too young to drive, vote, or graduate high school. The reason? Michigan's harsh, outdated laws don't allow judges to determine appropriate punishments on a case-by-case basis or guarantee a fair opportunity for parole for young people serving these unforgiving sentences. That's why I'm calling on legislators to push for reforms that recognize children cannot be held to the same standards of responsibility as adults. Tell legislators: "Now is the time. Michigan’s laws must be reformed in the interests of true justice." I served as a judge for over a quarter century and witnessed society move away from such harsh punishments. In fact, legislation is in the works to reform the Michigan’s law right now. But it won't happen without your support. Michigan needs to stop this cruel and unusual practice. I've seen firsthand that people can change and that our society is stronger when it can demonstrate mercy. Can you help Michigan move into the future by sending a message to legislators? Can't see this video? Refresh this page. Please note that by playing this clip you may place a cookie on your computer. To learn more, view the ACLU of Michigan's privacy policy.

Public schools charging fees for classes? Police taking innocent people’s cars? Law enforcement detaining people for years without a trial? What’s going on? Find out how all these outrageous practices are occurring and what we’re doing to stop them in this week’s rights review.

The ACLU of Michigan has filed suit on behalf of a peaceful protester who was arrested under a law that doesn’t even exist, the ACLU and a conservative think tank have agreed on an important state and national issue, and a state university has taken an amazing step forward in the world of equal education and opportunities.

From fictions like Fahrenheit 451 to real world events during World War II and the Middle Ages, the destruction of books often appears as a cornerstone of dystopian societies. Unfortunately, it’s looking like we can add Michigan’s educational system to this frightening list.Last week, school workers revealed that a dumpster in Highland Park was filled with books meant for children to read and learn from, taken out of the high school and thrown away on orders from an Emergency Manager. Some in tears, community volunteers recovered what was left of the school’s library: less than 1,000 volumes of a library that once contained 10,000 books and audio-visual materials. In a city where children are struggling to learn to read in schools ill-equipped to teach, it's horrifying to think that educational and cultural materials have been ripped out of the hands of citizens by an all-powerful authority who announced "We are not in the business of libraries."Historically, the destruction of books has been an attempt to censor or silence an aspect of a culture. The Highland Park Senior High School library contained a large and historic collection of black history books, many of which are now lost forever.The “immune” Emergency Manager appointed by Governor Snyder seems to be ignoring this troubling parallel, especially telling in a state where many residents perceive that, in practice, emergency management has been reserved for people of color.Before anyone had heard about the book destruction, we already knew that the great majority of Highland Park students cannot read at grade level and that teaching aides had been ordered to falsify records. We've filed a lawsuit in an effort to guarantee that Highland Park students, and all students in our state, receive a quality education and chance at a bright future.With the dire statistics and worrying reports coming out of the city, it is obvious that Highland Park schools cannot afford to lose a single book. It is outrageous that the EM discarded opportunities for students to learn about their history and culture and to become informed and capable citizens.Michigan public schools are facing hard times, but it is imperative that the best interests of our children, which includes a lifetime of learning and reading, stays the main priority. 

Texas: the state where everything is bigger, including anti-woman legislation. It seems as though there is a competition between states of who can legislate the most extreme violations on women’s health. After a slow start, Texas jumped to the top of that disturbing list this week, as legislators called a special session just to push bills restricting women's rights into law. People in the Lone Star State aren't taking this quietly. Hundreds of women and men have gathered at the Capitol to protest a bill that would ban abortions after 20 weeks, could lead to the closure of nearly all abortion clinics in Texas, and puts up numerous other barriers preventing women from getting the health care they need. Inside the Texas Legislature, courageous Senator Wendy Davis is standing for women's rights, launching a 13 straight hour filibuster, through midnight tonight.