DETROIT — Detroit homeowners with incomes below or near the federal poverty line will be able to avoid tax foreclosure and stay in their homes for a cost of $1,000, under terms of a legal settlement approved today by the Detroit City Council. The agreement also makes it less burdensome for residents to apply for a city program exempting low-income homeowners from taxes they cannot afford. The settlement resolves MorningSide Community Organization v. Sabree, a lawsuit filed by the ACLU of Michigan, the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF), and Covington & Burling LLP, on behalf of seven Detroit homeowners and four neighborhood associations.

“We are excited to partner with the City of Detroit and community organizations to craft a creative settlement that will prevent thousands of Detroiters from losing their homes to tax foreclosure,” said Michael J. Steinberg, legal director of the ACLU of Michigan.  “It is a win for homeowners unfairly facing loss of their homes, and a win for the city, which will have fewer abandoned properties in residential neighborhoods. This agreement will hopefully mark the beginning of the end of the worst tax foreclosure crises since the Great Depression.”

Detroit homeowners who are currently in tax foreclosure and believe they are qualified should apply immediately, as they must be approved by July 13, to meet requirements of the Wayne County Treasurer. For assistance, contact the United Community Housing Coalition (UCHC) at (313) 963-3310, ext. 339.

“Detroit’s tax foreclosure crisis has decimated African-American communities throughout the City,” said Ajmel Quereshi, Senior Counsel at LDF. “The resolution achieved today will help keep hundreds of families in their homes this summer and ensure that homeowners in Detroit no longer have to pay taxes that they cannot and should not have to pay.”

The lawsuit alleged that a series of unfair procedural and logistical obstacles prevented low-income homeowners from receiving a poverty tax exemption under Detroit’s Homeowner Property Tax Assistance Program (HPTAP). These obstacles, combined with the fact that few eligible homeowners knew about the program, resulted in tens of thousands of low-income Detroiters losing their homes for inability to pay taxes they never should have had to pay in the first place. Since 2011, the Wayne County Treasurer has foreclosed on more than one in four properties in Detroit.

“Our neighborhoods are stronger when people stay in their homes,” said Kenneth Patterson of the Oakman Boulevard Community Association, one of the local neighborhood groups that filed the lawsuit in 2016. “This is good news for our community and for the city. Foreclosed homes often become abandoned, blighted and have to be torn down. It’s better to stop foreclosures before they happen.”

The MorningSide Community Organization, the Historic Russell Woods-Sullivan Area Association and Neighbors Building Brightmoor were also plaintiffs in the lawsuit.

“We are thrilled to work with the ACLU and our community partners to prevent tax foreclosures in the City,” said Eli Savit, senior advisor and legal counsel to Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan.  “Over the past several months, we have worked collaboratively to craft a settlement that builds on existing efforts to keep people in their homes.  Those efforts are already bearing fruit.  We are confident that—working together—we will be able to help thousands of Detroiters, and stabilize neighborhoods across the city.  This is a big win for everyone.”

Under the terms of the settlement:

The City of Detroit will mail a notice, each year, to all city homeowners with homes worth less than $95,000 about tax relief for low-income households available through the Homeowners Property Tax Assistance Program (HPTAP).  

The city will create a streamlined application HPTAP process, similar to other cities, with fewer paperwork requirements for applicants. 

The HPTAP application—which previously could only be obtained by mail after filling out an application in person at the Coleman A. Young Municipal Center—will now be available for download on the city’s website at detroitmi.gov.

For poverty exemption-eligible homeowners with homes currently in foreclosure, the city will exercise its “Right of First Refusal” (ROR) to purchase these homes from the Wayne County Treasurer before the properties are sold at a tax auction.

The City of Detroit will forgo recovery of its portion of the taxes, resulting in an approximately 40 percent reduction in back taxes owed.

After acquiring properties of eligible applicants, the city of Detroit will sell the homes at the discounted rate to the United Community Housing Coalition (UCHC). The city will contribute $275,000 to the funds UCHC will use to purchase homes this year. This will build upon a program that was piloted last year between local philanthropies and the city.

UCHC will sell the acquired homes back to their original owners for $1,000, which will be used to save additional homes from foreclosure over the next two years. If a homeowner does not have $1,000, UCHC will work with the homeowner to develop a non-interest payment plan.

The city will continue its “Homeowner Right-of-Refusal Program” to enable poverty exemption-eligible homeowners to save their homes from foreclosure for $1000 for the next three tax years: 2018, 2019 and 2020.

“This is a great outcome for low-income homeowners and the City of Detroit as a whole, said Shankar Duraiswamy, partner at Covington & Burling LLP. “The settlement will ensure that the HPTAP tax exemption is actually accessible to those who it was designed to assist: struggling Detroit homeowners.  We are hopeful that today’s settlement will help to prevent another tax foreclosure crisis from arising in the City of Detroit in the future,”

Attorneys for the plaintiffs in the case are Michael Steinberg, Bonsitu Kitaba, Dan Korobkin, Mark Fancher and Kimberly Buddin-Crawford for the ACLU of Michigan; Sherrilyn Ifill, Janai Nelson, Coty Montag, Ajmel Quereshi, and Marne Lenox for the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund; and Shankar Duraiswamy, Amia L. Trigg, Sarah E. Tremont, Jason R. Grimes, Wesley W. Wintermyer and Donald Ridings, Jr. for Covington & Burling LLP. 

DETROIT, Mich. – U.S. District Judge Mark Goldsmith ruled today that it is unconstitutional to strip children, who had been serving life sentences, of credits for good behavior. State lawmakers had passed legislation that retroactively deprived these children of this sentence reduction program.

“Today’s ruling is a tremendous victory for fairness in our criminal justice system,” said Dan Korobkin, ACLU of Michigan Deputy Legal Director and one of the plaintiffs’ attorneys in the case. “Hundreds of youth who were serving unconstitutional life sentences will now benefit from good-time credits they earned in prison for good behavior, credits that were taken away from them by mean-spirited retroactive legislation in 2014.”

“Restoring these credits to individuals who earned them will likely save the state millions of dollars, and will give deserving individuals a chance to reunite with their families when they no longer pose a threat to society,” adds Korobkin.

Read the decision.

The ACLU sued the state in 2010 challenging the constitutionality of juvenile life-without-parole sentences.  The U.S. Supreme Court eventually ruled that mandatory life without parole is unconstitutional for children.  In response to that ruling, the Michigan legislature enacted the current law, which required individuals to be resentenced to lengthy prison sentences and took away good-behavior credits they had been earning for years, and in some cases for decades.

DETROIT — Today the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled that R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes unlawfully discriminated against Aimee Stephens when it fired her after she notified her employer that she would begin working openly as female because she is a transgender woman. The ruling affirms that transgender individuals are protected by federal sex discrimination laws, and that religious belief does not give employers the right to discriminate against them. Today’s decision reverses the lower court’s decision, which held that religious belief was sufficient to exempt the employer from anti-discrimination laws.

Learn more about the case.

John Knight, senior staff attorney with the LGBT & HIV Project for the American Civil Liberties Union, who argued the case, had the following response:

“Today’s decision is an exciting and important victory for transgender people and allied communities across the country. In too many workplaces around the country, coming out as trans is a fireable offense, as our client Aimee Stephens personally experienced. But this ruling affirms that that is illegal, setting an important precedent confirming that transgender people are protected by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. It also ensures that employers will not be able to use their religious beliefs against trans employees, ruling that there is no ‘right to discriminate’ in the workplace. We are thrilled for Aimee, and for all trans folks, to be able to announce this win today.”

The ACLU and ACLU of Michigan represent Aimee Stephens and intervened on her behalf last year in the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s lawsuit against RG & GR Harris Funeral Homes.

Ms. Stephens had the following response:

“I pursued this case because no one should be fired from their job just for being who they are. I’m thrilled with the court’s decision.”

Learn more about the case here.

Read the Sixth Circuit’s decision here.