The American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan and the American Civil Liberties Union Women’s Rights Project sent a letter to the University of Michigan urging its administration to withdraw an interim policy that requires students who file sexual misconduct complaints to undergo cross-examination conducted personally by their alleged abusers.

As explained in the letter, the ACLU is committed to a fair process, both for those who allege that they have been harassed or assaulted, and for those accused of such conduct. Due process and fundamental fairness require cross-examination in higher education cases where serious discipline is possible. But students accused of sexual abuse should not be permitted to personally conduct a cross-examination of the complainant. Cross-examination should be conducted by trained representatives – not by the students themselves.

“The University should not require those who allege sexual violence to undergo cross-examination conducted by the very individual accused of having committed the assault,” said Bonsitu Kitaba, deputy legal director at the ACLU of Michigan. “The only people conducting cross-examination in these very difficult hearings should be representatives with professional training.”

The ACLU's letter warns that a policy where those alleged to have engaged in assault or harassment personally question the complainant risks deterring complaints, traumatizing those who go forward with complaints, and creating a hostile campus environment, all in violation of Title IX. Most universities do not require cross-examination to be conducted by the parties themselves. The letter urges the University to adopt a policy that complies with Title IX and due process, by providing for cross-examination by those trained in the practice.

“The University of Michigan’s policy is unnecessarily traumatizing for those who report sexual assault and could deter survivors from coming forward,” said Sandra Park, senior staff attorney with the ACLU Women’s Rights Project. “It could also contribute to a hostile environment on campus in violation of Title IX.”

Date

Thursday, September 5, 2019 - 3:15pm

Featured image

University Michigan Union

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Women's Rights Due Process Safe and Free Student Rights Criminal Legal Reform

Documents

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

30

Show PDF in viewer on page

Style

Standard with sidebar

DETROIT – The American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan (ACLU) applauds the Grand Rapids Police Department’s (GRPD) foreign nationals policy announced today. The policy comes after the ACLU and community partners have long been advocating for a policy to limit entanglement between the GRPD and U.S. Immigration Customs Enforcement (ICE).

“This new policy recognizes that the police are here to serve everyone in the community,” said Miriam Aukerman, ACLU of Michigan senior staff attorney. “Immigrants who need help from the police shouldn’t have to fear that if they call 911, they will lose their families and lives in America. This policy recognizes that when local police get involved in immigration enforcement, it undermines community trust, leads to racial profiling, and makes everyone less safe.” 

This GRPD policy announced today is adopted after ICE jailed U.S. citizen and Marine Corps veteran Jilmar Ramos-Gomez based on a tip from GRPD Captain Curt VanderKooi.  Captain VanderKooi asked ICE to check the “status” of Mr. Ramos-Gomez, who is Latinx, even though he was arrested while in possession of his U.S. passport and Marine Corps tags. Mr. Ramos-Gomez spent three days in ICE detention before his family’s lawyer was able to prove that he was a U.S. citizen and secure his release. The City’s Civilian Appeal Board later found that that Captain VanderKooi had discriminated against Mr. Ramos-Gomez.

Under the new policy, people cannot be stopped, questioned, arrested, searched, or detained based solely on suspected violations of civil immigration law. In the case of Mr. Ramos-Gomez, for example, Captain VanderKooi would have been barred from contacting ICE simply because he thought Mr. Ramos-Gomez was not in the country legally. 

“While what happened to Jilmar should never have happened,” said Aukerman, “we are glad that the GRPD is taking steps to make sure that nothing like that ever happens again.”

This policy also prohibits police from inquiring into a person’s immigration status when they are seeking police services.

“This policy will enhance public safety by encouraging victims and witnesses to come forward regardless of immigration status,” said Aukerman.
 

WATCH GRPD FOOTAGE OBTAINED BY THE ACLU 

This GRPD video and records, obtained by the ACLU and released on April 30, show GRPD knew Mr. Ramos-Gomez was a U.S. citizen before turning him over to ICE

Date

Friday, August 23, 2019 - 3:00pm

Featured image

082319 GRPD New Policy-1-01.png

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Immigrants' Rights Due Process Criminal Legal Reform

Show related content

Pinned related content

Related bios

Menu parent dynamic listing

30

Show PDF in viewer on page

Style

Standard with sidebar

Pages

Subscribe to ACLU of Michigan RSS