The ACLU and ACLU of Michigan are fighting a new state law that bans many public entities from providing health care insurance to the domestic partners of their employees. The Public Employee Domestic Partner Benefit Restriction Act does just what its title says – it takes health care coverage away from the lesbian and gay domestic partners of public employees.

This law will have devastating repercussions for hardworking LGBT families across the state. The four couples named in the lawsuit are in long-term committed relationships. Several of the domestic partners need ongoing medical care for chronic conditions, and each of the families will face unfair financial burdens for simply trying to take care of one another.

Update: On November 12, 2014, a federal judge ruled the law unconstitutional and permanently enjoined the law’s enforcement. read more...

> Read more about the case


Peter Ways and Joe Breakey of Ann Arbor have been in a committed relationship for more than 20 years and have a nine-year-old daughter, Aliza. Peter works for Ann Arbor Public Schools. The district extends insurance coverage to his partner Joe who is self-employed as a licensed therapist. Being self-employed gives Joe the flexibility to be home for their daughter after school. Due to the added expense that comparable individual coverage will cost, Peter and Joe are considering a move back to Washington so that Peter could take a job that provides family benefits.

> Watch Peter & Aliza talk about how this law affects their family



Theresa Bassett and Carol Kennedy of Ann Arbor have been in a committed relationship for 25 years and have six kids ranging in age from six to 20 years old. Theresa has worked for the Ann Arbor Public Schools for 28 years and currently teaches 6th grade and 8th grade math. Theresa’s employer extends health insurance coverage to Carol who is self-employed as a daycare provider. Because of Carol’s family history of breast cancer, individual comprehensive insurance coverage will be extremely expensive. In fact, Carol estimates that purchasing comprehensive coverage on her own will cost the family an additional $800 a month, putting considerable pressure on their finances, which are already strained by a mortgage and the cost of sending two children to college.

JoLinda Jach and Barbara Ramber of Kalamazoo have been in a committed relationship for 17 years and have two young children. JoLinda has worked for the City of Kalamazoo for 24 years and her employer extends health insurance coverage to Barbara who works part-time in order to be home for their kids after school. Although Barbara can purchase health insurance coverage through her employer, the $540 per month price tag is more than half of her monthly take-home pay. JoLinda is not a contracted employee with the City of Kalamazoo and therefore Barbara’s health insurance coverage lapsed on December 31, 2011. Barbara has glaucoma and rheumatoid arthritis. Her medications alone will cost the family $300 a month if her insurance is not reinstated.


Doak Bloss and Gerardo Ascheri of Lansing have been in a committed relationship for 18 years. Doak has worked for Ingham County since 1998 and currently serves as its Health Equity and Social Justice Coordinator. Doak’s employer extends health insurance coverage to Gerardo who is self-employed as a piano instructor and does not have access to employer-provided health insurance coverage. Gerardo has high blood pressure and high cholesterol. He estimates individual insurance coverage would cost the family $500 a month in premiums. The coverage would include a $1,500 deductible, a 50 percent co-pay for prescriptions and would not include dental and vision coverage.

Watch Doak and Gerardo talk about how this law affects their family


Denise Miller and Michelle Johnson are residents of Kalamazoo, where Denise has taught at Kalamazoo Valley Community College for seventeen years. Denise’s job provided health coverage to Michelle, who is the executive director of a non-profit which does not offer health insurance. Denise paid taxes and contributed to the monthly premium cost for Michelle’s coverage, as Michelle has breast tumors that require continued monitoring. Her health conditions make it extremely difficult for Michelle to find affordable coverage, and she has been without health coverage since the Act was signed into law.

Key News and Documents

► Case Page | Learn more about this case, see videos and current developments

► News | ACLU Challenges Michigan Domestic Partner Health Care Ban

► Learn More | LGBT Rights

Learn more about issues you care about and take action: become a member,subscribe to our email action alertsfollow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.