Today the American Civil Liberties Union and ACLU of Michigan filed a motion in federal court asking to intervene in a lawsuit that was filed against Williamston Community Schools for adopting policies that prohibit discrimination against students for their sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression. The ACLU is representing Stand with Trans, a statewide organization that supports transgender youth and their families, and Williamston High School’s Gay-Straight Alliance (GSA), a student-run LGBT support group.

Read our motion here. 

“Children thrive in school when they are free from discrimination, harassment and bullying,” said Jay Kaplan, ACLU of Michigan LGBT Project staff attorney. “The school district’s policies protect all students regardless of their sexual orientation or identity.”

The lawsuit against the school district was filed in January by a group of parents and students who claim, among other things, that the district’s anti-discrimination policies violate parents’ rights by infringing on their religious and moral ideas about whom their children should be or with whom they should associate. The plaintiffs specifically object to the policies’ protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity, claiming that the policies force their children to share programs and facilities with transgender students and approve of “alternative sexual lifestyles.”

“LGBT students are at an increased risk for harassment and discrimination, and we know that inclusive school policies are a critical tool in preventing the negative health and educational outcomes that is the result of anti-LGBT discrimination,” said attorney Shayna Medley-Warsoff of the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation. “This lawsuit is a broad-based attack on LGBT students, and transgender students in particular.”

In the motion to intervene, the ACLU argues that the LGBT support groups should be permitted to join the case in order to represent the interests of LGBT students who will be directly impacted. They argue that the policies foster an educational environment that is safe, welcoming, and free from stigma and discrimination, as is required by law.  

In addition to Kaplan and Medley-Warsoff, Stand With Trans and the GSA are represented by John Knight from the ACLU, Dan Korobkin and Michael J. Steinberg of the ACLU of Michigan, and Deborah Kovsky-Apap and Matthew Lund of the Detroit law firm Pepper Hamilton LLP.

Date

Monday, March 12, 2018 - 2:15pm

Featured image

Flag waving with rainbow colors

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

The Nancy Katz & Margo Dichtelmiller LGBTQ+ Project Student Rights

Documents

Show related content

Style

Standard with sidebar
The American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan, in a letter sent today, urged the Michigan State Police to do a comprehensive review of whether black and Latino motorists are pulled over by a special MSP security team, while traveling along Interstate 94, at a rate significantly higher than white motorists. 
 
 
After receiving multiple complaints from drivers regarding possible racial profiling along I-94, the ACLU of Michigan requested records from MSP related to stops made by the Fifth District Hometown Security Team on several days during part of 2017. 
 
“These records alone do not prove racial profiling, but certainly raise concerns and warrant a thorough and complete investigation of MSP traffic stops,” said Mark Fancher, staff attorney for the ACLU of Michigan.  
 
The records that the MSP produced show that from Tuesday, Nov. 15, 2016, through Thursday, Nov. 17, 2016, one of the troopers made stops that brought him into contact with 15 individuals who were either drivers or passengers. Seven of these 15 individuals were identified as black, and four were identified as Hispanic. The race of one driver was not identified. The three remaining individuals were identified as white. The encounter with one of the white drivers was apparently not because of actual or suspected violations of the law, but for the purpose of providing assistance with the driver’s vehicle. 
 
The ACLU of Michigan then requested records of stops made by other members of the Fifth District Hometown Security Team on six randomly selected Fridays during the first quarter of 2017. The records produced by MSP show that on those days, four of the more active members of that unit made stops that brought them into contact with 82 individuals who were either drivers or passengers. Almost 48 percent of these individuals were identified by the troopers as black, Hispanic or Asian. About 24 percent of these individuals were identified as white. Another 28 percent were reported to be of unknown racial identity.
 
When the ACLU of Michigan raised similar concerns about a year ago, MSP admitted that they had no way of tracking the race of motorists pulled over. That resulted in a new policy of mandatory reporting of racial identities. Now that there is data that can be fully analyzed to identify any patterns that may exist, the ACLU has asked MSP to do an agency-wide investigation of traffic stops and to share its findings with the public.
 
"We hope MSP will heed our call for an internal probe, but even if they don't, we're not finished with our own investigation," said Fancher. "We have asked MSP for more records of traffic stops, and we are interested in what they will reveal. These records alone do not prove racial profiling, but certainly raise concerns and warrant a thorough and complete investigation of MSP traffice stops."

Date

Thursday, January 18, 2018 - 3:15pm

Featured image

Blue Michigan State Police patrol car

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Racial Justice

Documents

Show related content

Pinned related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

30

Style

Standard with sidebar

Michigan has one of the longest averages for time served in prison in the U.S.The average minimum sentence has increased 26 percent, reaching 9.5 years in 2015. The number one reason people are spending more time behind bars is the subjective input of the state parole board, which decides who to release and when.  But this will change with a new law signed by Governor Snyder on Sept. 12 called “Objective Parole,” will result in more people – who have been rehabilitated and are safe to return to their communities – being released from prisons, as well as save the state tens of millions of dollars annually, according to the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC), which supports this legislation.

Under state law, parole guidelines are used to score prisoners on a variety of factors to determine if they should be released.  This scoring takes into account the individual’s current sentence, criminal record, institutional conduct, statistical risk for committing assaultive or property related crimes, the completion of required programming while incarcerated, mental health, age, and plan for housing.  A high probability score means the person is low risk for reoffending and should be set free when they have served their minimum sentence. But the old law also allowed parole board to deny release based on “substantial and compelling reasons.” In effect, the board could insert opinions such as the person “lacks empathy” or “lacks tools to address their problems,” without providing evidence. Consequently, the parole board denied release based on “subjective” perceptions rather than the “objective” scoring system. The results were clear: The number of prisoners in Michigan who were eligible for parole, but kept in prison past their earliest release date more than nearly tripled from 5,687 people in 1991, to 15,950 people in 2006. In 2016, nearly half of all parole cases considered were denied.2

The new law clarifies  "substantial and compelling," so that subjectivity is reduced, if not eliminated from the parole process. It also requires the state parole board to base decisions in facts, which research shows leads to accurate predictions of a person’s likelihood to reoffend when released. 

Here is how, in large part, the new law will work:

▪ It requires parole boards to give more deference to the sentences judges impose based on sentencing guidelines;

▪ The state parole board also will submit a report to the legislature that includes the number of prisoners who are low risk offenders and were granted parole, deferred parole pending completion of a certain program, and denied parole.  The report also will include the number of individuals who completed their minimum sentence, but were denied parole; and  

▪ The law does NOT change when people are eligible for parole, and preserves the parole board's ability to deny parole of low-risk prisoners based on legitimate safety concerns.

All of these reforms will result in fewer low risk people, who completed their minimal sentence, from needlessly sitting behind bars. It will also reduce the prison population by 3,200 within five years, resulting in average annual savings of $75 million, according to the MDOC.

It is not only fiscally smart to allow people who are low risk and eligible for parole – based on objective guidelines – to be released from prison. Objective parole is critical to ending Michigan’s decades of mass incarceration and ensuring that thousands of people who paid their dues go free.


[1] Pew Center on the States. 2012. Time Served: The High Cost, Low Return of Longer Prison Terms. Washington, DC: Pew Center on the States.
[2] MDOC 2017 Parole Board Decisions Report.

Date

Tuesday, January 8, 2019 - 4:15pm

Featured image

sentence reform graphic

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Criminal Legal Reform

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

30

Style

Standard with sidebar

Pages

Subscribe to ACLU of Michigan RSS